Access to justice in Pakistan remains a significant challenge, particularly for marginalized and vulnerable groups, despite legal frameworks and reforms intended to promote fairness and equality. The formal justice system, though based on principles of rule of law, faces substantial barriers, including lengthy delays, complex procedures, high costs, and a lack of trust in legal institutions. These barriers disproportionately affect women, children, religious minorities, persons with disabilities, and those living in rural or conflict-affected areas, leaving them unable to access timely, affordable, or effective legal recourse.
One of the main obstacles to justice is the backlog of cases within the judiciary. Pakistan’s courts are overwhelmed with millions of pending cases, which results in delayed justice. This backlog not only impacts the efficiency of the justice system but also diminishes the public’s confidence in the rule of law. Many individuals, particularly the poor, cannot afford legal representation, exacerbating their inability to seek justice.
Legal aid services are insufficient, and many marginalized communities lack awareness of their rights and available legal resources. Although some initiatives, such as the Pakistan Legal Aid Support Network (PakProbono), have made strides in providing free legal assistance, the scope and outreach of these programs remain limited. Moreover, gender-based violence victims often face significant challenges in accessing justice due to societal stigma, fear of retribution, and a lack of specialized support systems.
Discrimination within the justice system also hinders equitable access to justice. Women, religious minorities, and lower caste communities face systemic biases, which are reflected in both judicial attitudes and the implementation of laws. Religious minorities, in particular, continue to experience legal and social exclusion, especially in the context of blasphemy laws and family laws that do not adequately protect their rights.
The police and law enforcement agencies also pose significant challenges for justice access. Corruption, inefficiency, and a lack of training often lead to violations of citizens’ rights and hinder the effective functioning of the criminal justice system. Many individuals, particularly in rural areas, face difficulties in accessing police services due to geographic isolation, lack of resources, and a general mistrust of the police force.
Efforts to improve alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as Mediations and Dispute Resolution Councils (DRCs), have shown promise in offering more accessible and community-based solutions to legal disputes. However, these mechanisms often lack the authority and resources to address serious criminal cases or more complex legal issues effectively.
In addition, technology and innovation are beginning to play a more significant role in improving access to justice, with initiatives such as mobile apps for legal empowerment and online dispute resolution platforms. These tools, if properly expanded, could help bridge the gap in access to legal services, particularly in remote or underserved areas.
In conclusion, while legal frameworks in Pakistan provide the basis for ensuring access to justice, numerous challenges persist, including delays, costs, discrimination, and a lack of awareness. Addressing these barriers requires strengthening legal aid services, judicial reforms, police accountability, and the integration of technology in legal processes. Only through a multi-dimensional approach that prioritizes inclusivity, education, and empowerment will Pakistan be able to ensure equitable access to justice for all its citizens.